| |
下面引用由cscr在 2007/01/28 00:32am 發表的內容：
So? Could I guess that there will be another episode of wholesale slaughter aiming at this rare, hard-to-keep poor little fish, mmm.......under the name of self-righteous, consecrated goal of "conservation"? Since you guys (notorious, I deem, at least in terms of these miserable fishes' right to survive! ) know that this fish is so scarce and endangered, how could you be sure that such "en masse" specimen-securing activity will not do any harm to them?
And, how could you assure us that the exact location of these habitats will not be exposed to the public during your "happy collecting tour", and nothing will be altered after that?
If you do dare to proclaim your charity of collecting whatever fish merely on account of their rarity, then I'll query : who warrants you or endorses your declaration? And if the final result, such as vanishing of a local population or even worse, their habitat occurs, who will be responsible for such outcome? Does wild life belong to anyone regarding himself to be a patron saint of conservation?
Showiness of collecting and keeping many rare species of fishes is by no means conservation, contrarily, only those psychopathic in personality will boast of his collections at the expense of other creatures' lives!
|
|
自動軟體的翻譯太恐怖了吧! 看看人工翻譯的結果(請讀文科朋友幫忙的):
怎麼? 又想以"自以為是"的神聖保育口號, 對這稀有難養的可憐小魚進行另一波的大屠殺嗎?
個人觀感--從魚類生存權的角度而言, 堪稱聲名狼藉的你們這群人, 既然認為這種魚稀有而且瀕危, 那麼, 敢拍胸脯保證"在經過大陣仗的採集後, 對這種魚不會造成任何傷害"?
而且, 在你們"快樂"的採集過程中, 敢說棲地所在的精確位置不會因此而曝光? 經過你們的蹂躪後, 還能說"一切仍如往常"?
如果(回答完這些問題後)你還敢大言不慚地宣稱自己" 看到稀有魚種就想搜集"的(不正常)習性完全出自對魚類的善意, 那麼, 我再問你 : 是誰, 准你這麼做了? 而有哪個人, 願為你的說詞背書負責? 況且, 如果最後(因為你那善意)造成某魚種地區族群的消滅或棲地的破壞, 誰來負責呢? 野生生物, 難道不是你我共同的財產, 而僅是某個自封"保育守護神"者的禁臠?
炫耀一堆"自己收集過或正在飼養中"的珍稀魚種, 不但完全扯不上"保育", 相反地, 只有具病態人格的人, 才會把此種"以其他生物之生命為代價而獲得的成果"當成自己的功績, 吹噓不已!
| | |
|
|
|
頂端 
加到"我的最愛"
主題管理：
總固頂 
取消總固頂 
Message
查看
搜尋
通訊錄
複製
引用
回覆
2007/01/30 03:14pm 
IP: 已設定保密
