| | [這篇文章最後由cscr在 2007/01/31 12:10pm 第 6 次編輯]
下面引用由台灣白魚痴在 2007/01/29 10:43pm 發表的內容：
hero8479 大大:cscr大大是針對我啦!不過又不是第一次.反正還是會有反對的聲音啦!人家說的也是做為改進之處.你說的好友應該還在攻讀博士吧!魚的增多或許如 cscr大大所說的非是保護.不過我們想做的只是把魚留下來而已.就如此單純.若要把我視為人格變態也可.畢竟不同意如此看法還是不同意.如同每一個人有不同心態與想法.惡名昭彰自以為事若如此認為無話可說.
而一種魚的消失大家都有責任.若今天因為我採集而要灌上這種魚的消失.我想我沒有如此的神通廣大.而神聖不是我說的是被人灌上的.贊成繁殖一些魚的保種也是有贊成的一方.今天我是無任何經費去做此事.有反對之聲這是一定的.我重來沒說過我這樣做一定是對的.想法一體兩面.
回到最初.是誰讓我們知道這些魚類.那些學者的研究憑空想像嗎?那麼他們的研究給我們認知而培養出你們所說的惡名昭彰的我來.那麼你們要怪不就要怪到學者身上呢?總之一些想法你可把它想好也可把它想壞.你不認同我說我不好那那個人一定是不好嗎?難道今天非得一種魚後代看不到後才去辯別對與錯好與壞呢?若如此代價不是很大呢?
台灣鮰真的很稀有.為何不讓我們試試為牠做繁殖呢?而我們採集的方式是釣捕.能釣到不能釣到還是未知.而稀少的原因有幾項因素.九二一 七二水災 還有是職業漁人的電捕.消息是當地的人士由魚販口中得知.若今天牠不是那麼危急那麼會去採捕嗎?
不管我這人在別人眼中如何.是惡名昭彰也好 是目中無人自以為事也好.或者是人格變態都可.至少敢扛起以後人對我的看法.若要把魚的消失全都膛塞與我的話.對我是不是有些不公平呢?
|
|
Don’t (or “please don’t”, if I have to be as educated, calm, and polite as possible in discussing such a serious issue) equate yourself with a praiseworthy conservationist, nor should your incontinent collecting behavior be regarded as admirable and morally impeccable one!
It is appropriate for me now, in winter vacation, and with no cumbersome affairs related to the noisy students, to debate with you on the misgiving : why are you so wrong to be blamed?
I didn’t anticipate that you would answer my previous queries all at a time 2 days ago. Now I am also sure that it may be exorbitant to request you to do it orderly after reading your hotchpotch-like, befuddling confession. In addition, tricks of rhetoric should not be what the audience is awaiting, although such nasty skills might work in the past! I am immune to these trickeries, believe me or not!
To accuse your original motive in collecting rare fishes of being sinister may be unfair, for this I apologize. But, in contrast, the narration made by you that it is morally tenable just because of the fact that all the collectiions are performed in an authentically legal way – merely fishing – can not convince me, either.
Frankly speaking, it is not difficult, and seems plausible, to recognize that some species are rare, and in some instances, it is not fallacious to speculate that they are also endangered from the limited number of field investigation written by expert scholars. But to know this is one thing (although in your case intuition plays a major role), to do it recklessly(such as resorting to conserving measures in an egocentric way) is quite another !
I wonder by what kind of pretentiousness can you raise your personal concern to so high a level and claim that the formosan torrent catfish’s destiny will not be extricable from their suffocating situation if it does not receive your benevolent and timely salvage?
Here lies the fact. It is not this poor fish that genuinely and stringently awaits rescue from you, but somebody eagerly tries his hand at capturing and keeping some specimens…………..to show off, to fill the last piece of puzzle in his own collection, to trade for some other fishes that are even rarer, or anything possible, except conservation!
Say, are you not so mighty? Of course I agree with you on that! But you can’t just deny the truth that albeit not mighty at all, you are highly resourceful in hunting for rare fishes. For example, a motley crew of followers gathers around you, most of them are naïve but appealed to exaggerated description; instant communication via internet from all over this island could make you grasp wherever, whoever, whenever, however, whatever……..anything related to those fishes you are craving for.
With this armament, I think it’s so easy for you to recruit a team of crusader to follow suit, as you intend to do - in pursuit of the torrent catfish. Now the goal has been set, and the crusader team is organized…….what would be the fate of the victims and their home, does anyone care?
| | |
|
|
|
頂端 
加到"我的最愛"
主題管理：
總固頂 
取消總固頂 
Message
查看
搜尋
通訊錄
複製
引用
回覆
2007/01/30 02:35am 
IP: 已設定保密
